A Central DSS Report Development Center

A Central DSS Report Development Center

What are some of the positive and negative aspects of creating a Central DSS Report Development center? Are you aware of any of your clients that have done so and would be willing to share what they learned?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    When you register, you'll begin receiving targeted emails from my team of award-winning editorial writers on the latest customer relationship management (CRM)and call center technology issues today. Our goal is to keep you informed on the hottest issues facing this fast-changing industry.

    Hannah Smalltree, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchCRM.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchCRM.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

As an industry, we've done a terrible job at putting out common definitions for DW architectures and components so I hope I address what you mean with your terminology.

A Central DSS Report Development center sounds like a centralized data warehouse where most corporate reports are run from, something that many have created. This would be in opposition to another popular architecture, one that is also popular, but sometimes not planned -- independent data marts. Most folks are somewhere in the middle and some are providing bridges between the marts and the warehouse(s) via a "federated" approach.

Based on some of my client experiences with this architecture, I would count the major benefits of the centralized approach as having to do with efficiencies and economies -- less operational impact, lowered overall staff requirements and tool standards leading to a lowered overall cost to serve. Data standards -- wide use of accepted data representations -- provide the greatest benefit. You can see my DM Review article at http://www.dmreview.com/master.cfm?NavID=198&EdID=2162 and my recent article for Teradata magazine at http://www.teradatamagazine.com/articles/2Q_2002/enterprise/default.htm for more on this topic.

For more information, check out SearchCRM's Best Web Links on Data Warehousing.


This was first published in July 2002

Join the conversationComment

Share
Comments

    Results

    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.