Customer address verification during incoming calls
We are an insurance service call center of over 200+ associates. I am a
Process Design Consultant tasked with eliminating the large amount of
returned mail that we receive due to bad addresses in our systems. As
part of the solution, I would like to create a process within the call
path for the customer service reps to verify the address of the agents calling
in. I am getting resistance to implementing this process as it will
increase the call talk time approximately 15-20 seconds. I feel that the
benefits in customer service alone would justify this. My
understanding is that it is a fairly common practice within the industry
to verify customer addresses when the call comes in. Is this true? Have other companies had issues with implementing this process? Any information you can provide on this would be appreciated.
When you register, you'll begin receiving targeted emails from my team of award-winning editorial writers on the latest customer relationship management (CRM)and call center technology issues today. Our goal is to keep you informed on the hottest issues facing this fast-changing industry.
Hannah Smalltree, Editorial Director
Sounds like a situation that calls for building a financial analysis. Yes, checking addresses will take time, and 15-20 seconds per call is not trivial in the potential impact on staffing, performance, and cost.
Many companies include address verification as part of their security or
identification steps. The key is to have a clear business reason for
doing it, and to be able to see the value. If you can show that the
cost saved in returned mail outweighs the cost of additional time for
validating addresses, perhaps you'll have a better chance. I would also
consider alternatives though - perhaps address update services, a round
of proactive (perhaps outsourced) contact to update addresses, mechanisms to make it easy for your agents to update their addresses with you via the Web or on a speech-based system (tied to address
services) are all possibilities.
Dig Deeper
-
People who read this also read...
This was first published in April 2004
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation