How to get rid of problem customers: Was Sprint justified?
What's your take on Sprint's decision to get rid of some of its "problem" customers? If we are trying to build customer loyalty, how can we justify getting rid of paying customers?

    Requires Free Membership to View

    When you register, you'll begin receiving targeted emails from my team of award-winning editorial writers on the latest customer relationship management (CRM)and call center technology issues today. Our goal is to keep you informed on the hottest issues facing this fast-changing industry.

    Hannah Smalltree, Editorial Director

    By submitting your registration information to SearchCRM.com you agree to receive email communications from TechTarget and TechTarget partners. We encourage you to read our Privacy Policy which contains important disclosures about how we collect and use your registration and other information. If you reside outside of the United States, by submitting this registration information you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Your use of SearchCRM.com is governed by our Terms of Use. You may contact us at webmaster@TechTarget.com.

Actually, given the number of customers who are, one way or another, BZs (Below Zero financial contribution) I'm very much in favor of dropping or getting rid of bad customers. This is an effective way of handling problem customers -- those who undermine, and/or endlessly disrupt, the ability of the organization to serve good customers.

With that said, Sprint could definitely have handled this firing of customers in a far more sensitive, less visible manner.

This was first published in August 2007

Join the conversationComment

Share
Comments

    Results

    Contribute to the conversation

    All fields are required. Comments will appear at the bottom of the article.