CRM failed because …
<table border="
width="147" align="left" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
There was a trend where people lost sight of the fact that CRM is
about your customers
Angela Bandlow
Vice president of CRM strategy and communicationSAP |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
The "F" word has surfaced again in recent weeks as vendors trying to capitalize on a maturing
market have offered their visions for the next phase of CRM's evolution.
"There was a trend where people lost sight of the fact that CRM is about your customers," Angela
Bandlow, vice president of CRM strategy and communication at SAP, said at the company's recent
Sapphire user conference in Orlando. "We're seeing companies that had point solutions … having
difficulty integrating those to [be able to] look at the entire solution."
Accordingly, For RightNow Technologies, a company with roots in the customer service
arena, managing the customer experience is the next evolution in CRM.
"I think the line between sales, service and marketing will disappear," said Greg Gianforte, CEO
of RightNow. "CRM failed because it focused too much on internal process improvement. There's a
shift in power from companies to consumers. You can't manage a relationship."
That sentiment jives with the assessments of Dick Lee, who believes CRM as a concept has failed
because it focused on the technology and internal processes rather than the needs of the customer.
And he has some research to back it up.
"We have a split that has developed between customer centricity and CRM," said Lee, founder and
principal of High Yield Methods, a St. Paul, Minn.-based consultancy. "The promise was [CRM] would
lead to customer centricity. What we have now is, the basic components of CRM as it's practiced
today -- people, process, technology -- are not delivering on customer centricity."
In a survey conducted in conjunction with David Mangen, of Mangen Research Associates, entitled
"Customers Say What Companies Don't Want to Hear," Lee found that a company's level of customer
focus was most important. When 547 customers were asked what company behavior most influenced
buying decisions, 60.3% said customer focus. Consumers said empowered employees (71%) ranked nearly
as high as quality products (76%) when it came to how they evaluated companies.
"The study outcomes clearly indicate that CRM is not fulfilling the original promise of CRM,"
Lee said. "From the get-go, this was going to be about how we improve relationships with customers,
how we could improve customer loyalty through delivering value to customers. All the lofty
ambitions seem to have been lost."
Historically, companies have focused their CRM efforts and investments on cutting internal costs
with tools such as online self-service or interactive voice response (IVR). These technologies help
decrease workloads and theoretically reduce costs, but they haven't necessarily been used to
understand customers and foster loyalty.
"When we look at what motivates customer buying decisions, CRM is not supporting the principal
motivators," Lee said. "In that sense, from a customer standpoint, CRM is somewhat irrelevant,
which is not what was supposed to happen."
What does matter to customers is companies that have empowered their employees. Amazon.com, for
example, the company rated highest in the study for customer centricity, empowers its agents to
correct company mistakes without a lengthy escalation process, Lee said.
For too long, companies have tried to persuade customers to do what's right for the company, but
now customers want the company to do what's right for them. And companies that can adopt this
philosophy stand to gain real competitive advantage -- particularly those companies in
commoditized, price-competitive industries where cutting operating costs is difficult, according to
the report.
Yet the market for CRM technology continues to thrive. According to a recent report from
Stamford, Conn.-based Gartner Inc., the worldwide market for CRM software grew 14% in 2005 to $5.7
billion.
Bellevue, Wa.-based Onyx Corp., which was
Dig Deeper
-
People who read this also read...
Join the conversationComment
Share
Comments
Results
Contribute to the conversation